Malawi’s political system changed from a one party dictatorship to a multi-party system of governance in 1994. This ushered a democratic system of government with a republican constitution that provided a comprehensive Bill of Rights for the individual. The result of the national referendum in 1993 clearly showed that the advent of multi-party democracy was demanded by the population of Malawi. A clear majority voted against the continuation of President Banda’s single party rule.
However, the time lapse between the referendum and the general election was not long enough to provide civic education for the nation on the concepts surrounding Democracy. AYISE was among the first youth movement that understood the urgent need for civic education on issues of Democracy and Human Rights.
Although some civic education has been disseminated, more needs still to be done. Many Malawians, particularly in the rural areas, are still unaware of the complexity of an ideal, functional democracy.
It is important to note that Malawi has made great progress in consolidating democracy. One indicator is the establishment of a number of state institutions which function effectively and independently in pursuit of democratic ideals. These include:
- the Anti-Corruption Bureau
- the Human Rights Commission
- the Law Commission
- the Electoral Commission
- the Malawi Police Service (MPS), reformed dramatically from the Malawi Police Force
Additionally, there has also been visible separation of powers between the various arms of Parliament (the legislature), the judiciary and the executive. The role the Malawian Parliament plays in consolidating democracy is now also understood by many Malawian citizens. Malawian citizens have become more aware of the public policy and legislative processes and this manifests itself in the way citizens across the country have justifiably taken to the streets when they see that certain processes carried out by public officials are contrary to national interests.
Further, the citizens and the various arms of government have learnt and appreciated the role of civil society in policy and legislative processes. This can be seen by the fact that government and other state actors have consulted NGOs and civil society actors when issues of national significance arise.
However, this does not mean that democracy and human rights are secure.